SWE case resolved through simple accepted disposal
Kings View client avoids lengthy fitness to practise hearing by agreeing to an Accepted Disposal.
Kings View client avoids lengthy fitness to practise hearing by agreeing to an Accepted Disposal.
In this case, the fitness to practise allegations made against our client, FG, was finalised by way of accepted disposal. The offer of an accepted disposal by SWE Case Examiners is fast becoming a standard way for SWE to dispose of cases.
Speaking about the case, Catherine Stock said:
It is extremely important to see legal advice if accepted disposals are offered. Social Workers need to be aware that there is a limited level of negotiation that can be done and that if the disposal is not accepted then the case will proceed to a full Fitness to Practise Hearing before a Tribunal.
“As such, careful consideration of an offer from Social Work England is necessary for many reasons such as reputation, financial and many more.”
FG said:
“Catherine having knowledge and experience of Fitness to Practice issues was very important and made me feel I made the right choice. I used her services twice and would work with her again.”
Disclaimer: This article is for guidance purposes only. Kings View Chambers accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken, in relation to this article. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.
More News & Articles
The behaviours most likely to put doctors before a tribunal
Newly published MPTS data for 2025–26 provides a detailed picture of the types of cases reaching substantive hearings and the factors that most commonly lead to findings of impairment, suspension or erasure.
GDC consultation signals a shift in early‑stage fitness to practise decision‑making — what dentists need to know
GDC launches consultation on new early‑stage fitness to practise guidance, shaping how concerns about dentists are assessed, escalated or closed.
High Court warns against prolonged interim orders in fitness to practise cases
The High Court has delivered an important reminder to healthcare regulators that interim orders are protective measures, not a substitute for progressing a fitness to practise investigation.

