Kings View assist registrant with registration difficulties
This was a case relating to failing to renew registration in time and continuing to practise using a protected title.
This was a case relating to failing to renew registration in time and continuing to practise using a protected title.
Our client, FN, said:
“Catherine Stock has been a fantastic help in winning my NMC FTP case after failed effort with previous solicitors. She had my back all the way, and I am very grateful to her for the outstanding victory.”
NMC defence barrister and joint head of chambers, Catherine Stock, said: “This was a case relating to failing to renew registration in time and continuing to practise using a protected title.
“This can be treated as a criminal offence by the regulator depending on the circumstances. What seems a small issues of failing to send your re-registration documents on time can have wide-ranging repercussions for the registrant and clients, who can be left with no avenue for recompense should things go wrong with their treatment.
“We would of course advise that you take active steps to ensure you are aware of your registration dates and requirements, but of course in life things can slip. If you find yourself in difficulty, contact us, and we can assist with next steps, how to communicate with your regulator and how to put things right.”
More News & Articles
All GPhC allegations dismissed in full following representations
A pharmacist successfully defended GPhC fitness to practise proceedings, with all allegations withdrawn and dismissed.
Whistleblowing remains a significant source of fitness to practise concerns across healthcare professions
Recent regulatory data suggests that whistleblowing continues to play an important role in bringing potential fitness to practise concerns to the attention of professional regulators across the healthcare sector.
The behaviours most likely to put doctors before a tribunal
Newly published MPTS data for 2025–26 provides a detailed picture of the types of cases reaching substantive hearings and the factors that most commonly lead to findings of impairment, suspension or erasure.

