The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has reported a continued rise in fitness to practise complaints including increase in anti-competitive behaviour.

The GPhC’s most recent fitness to practise update was discussed at its most recent council meeting.

The fitness to practise data showed that the GPhC reported a 29% increase in the number of fitness to practise concerns it received in April.  The pharmaceutical regulator received 318 concerns in April 2020, a 29% increase on the same month last year, when it received 246 complaints.

Interestingly, the nature of many of the complaints received were Covid-19 related including concerns related to hand gel and facemasks.

Other complaints included concerns related to pricing of medicines and possible anti-competitive practices.

The concerns relating to PPE, hand gels and other COVID-19 related products and services were referred to Competitions and Markets Authority “because of their role in relation to profiteering and anti-competitive behaviour.”

The council papers said: “Over 3000 concerns had been received in April 2020, which represented a 40% increase. Many related to pricing of medicines, hand gel and facemasks and some pointed to possible anti-competitive practice.  A consistent approach to pandemic-related concerns was being developed, including by dialogue with the Competition and Markets Authority.”

Some of the 3000 anti-competitive behaviour complaints appear to be attributable to individuals which raised fitness to practise concerns.  However, the GPhC is clearly concerned also with the broader issues of profiteering and anti-competitive behaviour in the pharmaceutical sector.

Kings View Chambers

Founded in 2014 by Stephen McCaffrey and Catherine Stock, Kings View Chambers seeks to address the failings in traditional chambers and establish a new and better way for barristers to work.

Specialist healthcare and medical regulation defence barristers dealing with all fitness to practise matters before:


Are you a healthcare professional with a fitness to practise issue?

Speak to a expert defence barrister today for a free, no obligation case assessment.

If Carlsberg ran regulatory law firms…this would probably be one of the best regulatory law firms in the world. They are truly the X-Factor of regulatory barristers.

Dr in GMC case