Great outcome for pharmacy client
“Stephen is an incredibly knowledgeable barrister with profound working knowledge of GPhC procedures. He was invaluable for us and achieved a result we are happy with. Well worth the money and highly recommended!”
Using our deep expertise in online pharmacy regulation, we helped secure a GPhC warning for a prescriber and director facing allegations linked to an online pharmacy.
Fitness to practise defence barrister and joint head of chambers, Stephen McCaffrey, represented both individuals throughout the investigation. Our long-standing track record in this niche regulatory area enabled us to persuade the GPhC to conclude the matter by way of a warning.
Our client said:
“Stephen is an incredibly knowledgeable barrister with profound working knowledge of GPhC procedures. He was invaluable for us and achieved a result we are happy with. Well worth the money and highly recommended!”
Stephen commented:
“The remote and online pharmacy sector is constantly evolving, as are the regulations governing it. It is a niche field, and those facing such matters should seek expert, experienced advice. We were delighted to secure this outcome for our clients.”
Unique and practical courses focusing on impairment, reflection, insight, and remediation at highly competitive prices.
Restoration Courses
Courses suitable for any health and social care practitioner who is considering making an application for restoration back onto the register.
Insight & Remediation
Courses that are suitable for any healthcare practitioner who is facing an investigation or hearing at work or before their regulatory body.
Probity, Ethics & Professionalism
Courses designed for those facing a complaint or investigation at work or before their regulator, involving in part or in whole honesty, integrity and /or professionalism.
Disclaimer: This article is for guidance purposes only. Kings View Chambers accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken, in relation to this article. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances. Some content may have been generated by AI tools.
More News & Articles
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise
The High Court’s decision highlights the importance of clinical justification, informed consent and professional boundaries, with practical lessons for doctors and other regulated healthcare professionals.
GPhC survey offers snapshot of the realities of practising pharmacy in 2026
Pharmacists remain confident in their professional judgement and committed to professional standards, but many are working in conditions they believe make safe practice harder to achieve.
Do you trust the GDC to reach the right fitness to practise outcome?
New research commissioned by the General Dental Council (GDC) has raised fresh questions about confidence in the fitness to practise process, with fewer than four in ten dental professionals saying they trust the process to reach the correct outcome.