Kings View Chambers secure no case to answer for nurse
Kings View Chambers secure a finding of no case to answer for a nurse accused of dishonesty in relation to post graduate course funding and signing off clinical competencies.
Kings View Chambers secure a finding of no case to answer for a nurse accused of dishonesty in relation to post graduate course funding and signing off clinical competencies.
Commenting on the case, leading NMC defence barrister, Catherine Stock said: “This case spells out the pitfalls involved in developing your own career versus what your employer deems to be suitable career development.
“If you are applying for public funding for any course, you must read the rules and regulations and ensure you are compliant.
The NMC in this instance took the view that this was an employment issue rather than a regulatory one, as the nurse was able to demonstrate the avenues she had taken however, all nurses should be aware that you must adhere to your employer’s expectations if you are applying through them for public funding or if you intend to ask colleagues to assess you as competent.
Nurse LJ commenting on the outcome of her case said: “Fabulous service from Kings View Chambers and Catherine Stock. Absolutely amazing service, such attention to detail and compassion was received.
“I felt supported round the clock, reassured throughout and always put in the picture. Catherine works with passion, diligence and dedication. I felt in good hands. Although I pray I never need to use them again, it has been my honour to come across such a wonderful team of passionate professionals.
“Thank you for being there when people had given up on me.”
More News & Articles
All GPhC allegations dismissed in full following representations
A pharmacist successfully defended GPhC fitness to practise proceedings, with all allegations withdrawn and dismissed.
Whistleblowing remains a significant source of fitness to practise concerns across healthcare professions
Recent regulatory data suggests that whistleblowing continues to play an important role in bringing potential fitness to practise concerns to the attention of professional regulators across the healthcare sector.
The behaviours most likely to put doctors before a tribunal
Newly published MPTS data for 2025–26 provides a detailed picture of the types of cases reaching substantive hearings and the factors that most commonly lead to findings of impairment, suspension or erasure.

