Kings View Chambers wins case against GPhC request for removal

A pharmacist facing serious regulatory action in the online pharmacy sector has avoided removal from the register after the General Pharmaceutical Council’s (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee accepted defence submissions and imposed a suspension instead.

A pharmacist facing serious regulatory action in the online pharmacy sector has avoided removal from the register after the General Pharmaceutical Council’s (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee accepted defence submissions and imposed a suspension instead.

The case involved a wide‑ranging and technically complex set of allegations relating to online pharmacy practice. Drawing on extensive experience in the sector, the defence team narrowed the issues, focused the case strategy, and prepared the matter for a Principal Hearing — an outcome that was unavoidable given the seriousness of the concerns.

The registrant accepted from the outset that regulatory action and a sanction were inevitable. The central focus of the defence was therefore resisting the GPhC’s request for removal. After hearing evidence and submissions, the Committee agreed that removal was not justified. Taking account of the pharmacist’s insight, remediation and fundamentally changed practice, it imposed a period of suspension.

Fitness to practise defence barrister Stephen McCaffrey said:

The focus was on winning against the GPhC request for removal. The Committee agreed with us and, taking account of his insight and remediation, alongside his fundamentally changed practise, imposed a suspension. Our client was delighted and we were equally delighted for him. 

Our client said:

“Stephen McCaffrey provided calm, strategic and highly skilled representation in an exceptionally serious and complex GPhC fitness to practise case, quickly mastering the detail, identifying the real issues and presenting them with clarity and persuasive force. His advocacy was measured and effective, challenging evidence where necessary and ensuring the Committee understood the full context and mitigation. Throughout, his judgement stood out: he was realistic, never offered false reassurance, and helped me navigate the strengths and risks of my position with honesty and care. His professionalism and genuine support made an intensely stressful process manageable, and I would strongly recommend him to any healthcare professional facing regulatory proceedings.”

Kings View Chambers has a proven track record representing doctors and other healthcare professionals in fitness to practise proceedings, including cases involving overseas disciplinary findings and cross‑border regulatory matters.

Rated Excellent and recognised for its expertise in professional discipline and healthcare regulation, Kings View Chambers regularly assists professionals facing serious regulatory investigations and proceedings.

Unique and practical courses focusing on impairment, reflection, insight, and remediation at highly competitive prices.

Insight Works Training

Restoration Courses

Courses suitable for any health and social care practitioner who is considering making an application for restoration back onto the register.

Insight Works Training

Insight & Remediation

Courses that are suitable for any healthcare practitioner who is facing an investigation or hearing at work or before their regulatory body.

Insight Works Training

Probity, Ethics & Professionalism

Courses designed for those facing a complaint or investigation at work or before their regulator, involving in part or in whole honesty, integrity and /or professionalism.

Disclaimer: This article is for guidance purposes only. Kings View Chambers accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken, in relation to this article. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.

More News & Articles