Social Work England finds Kings View client’s fitness to practise not impaired
In this case Kings View client, H, had been offered an agreed outcome by Social Work England but had refused to accept one aspect of the case against them. As a result, they were referred to a Fitness to Practise Tribunal.
In this case Kings View client, H, had been offered an agreed outcome by Social Work England but had refused to accept one aspect of the case against them. As a result, they were referred to a Fitness to Practise Tribunal.
H instructed Kings View at the stage of preparing for the Tribunal and representing him at the Tribunal. With the assistance of Kings View, H’s fitness to practise was found not to be impaired, and no warning or advice was deemed necessary.
Kings View fitness to practise defence barrister, Stephen McCaffrey, said:
“We achieved the best outcome possible for H in his fitness to practise case and hearing. “The client commented on our excellent preparation, human approach and contact.”
H, speaking after the successful conclusion of his case, said:
“If you value your career hire Ms Stock and Mr McCaffery.
“Mr McCaffery and Ms Stock are incredible barristers. They highlighted and dealt with dishonestly in my case leaving no case to answer.
“I was supported with a human approach throughout the whole process. Despite the hearing being via video conference, I was in constant contact with Mr McCaffery.
“DO NOT take chances on other representation, it is your career you are protecting, hire the best.”
More News & Articles
All GPhC allegations dismissed in full following representations
A pharmacist successfully defended GPhC fitness to practise proceedings, with all allegations withdrawn and dismissed.
Whistleblowing remains a significant source of fitness to practise concerns across healthcare professions
Recent regulatory data suggests that whistleblowing continues to play an important role in bringing potential fitness to practise concerns to the attention of professional regulators across the healthcare sector.
The behaviours most likely to put doctors before a tribunal
Newly published MPTS data for 2025–26 provides a detailed picture of the types of cases reaching substantive hearings and the factors that most commonly lead to findings of impairment, suspension or erasure.

