Success for Stephen McCaffrey in SRA case
Mr D approached Stephen McCaffrey, joint head of chamber, to take on his case having been recommended by his co-respondent in a Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proceedings.
Mr D approached Stephen McCaffrey, joint head of chamber, to take on his case having been recommended by his co-respondent in a Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proceedings.
Following a SRA investigation costing well over £100,000, allegations were made against Mr D in respect of various regulatory breaches in the running and management of his firm both generally and specifically. The allegations revolved around management of significant numbers of holiday sickness claims.
Following intense and protracted representations and negotiations lead by Stephen, the SRA accepted, and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal approved an agreed outcome, which limited costs to £1500 (as opposed to £173,000 requested), a one year suspension followed by conditions.
Stephen, commenting on the outcome of the case observed that:
“Mr D undoubtedly faced much more severe sanctions and significantly more financial liability. The success was founded on a sensible and agreed strategy from which we did not waiver.”
Following the outcome of the case, Mr D said:
“I was introduced to Stephen through my co-respondent in respect of an SRA referral. Stephen provided clear and well thought out advice and assisted me in coalescing my thoughts and instructions. He successfully negotiated a settlement that was exactly in line with my best likely outcome. I would thoroughly recommend his services.”
Aenean eleifend, quam quis ullamcorper venenatis, lorem neque venenatis mauris, et aliquet risus quam quis urna. Praesent vitae elit ut mauris semper ultricies sed eu nisi. Etiam dictum orci in enim pretium, et egestas odio consequat. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nam venenatis, lectus quis tristique efficitur, quam eros interdum nunc, sit amet commodo lacus eros at ligula. Maecenas vel nunc gravida, pharetra turpis vel, placerat neque. Vivamus varius tellus at ante posuere.
More News & Articles
General Dental Council close case with no further action
The General Dental Council has closed its investigation into our clients fitness to practise with no further action.
GMC’s duty of care. Is legal representation the answer?
The position on the GMC’s duty of care is now unquestionably clear. We look at the value of legal representation to assist doctors with the stress and anxiety associated with investigations.
Does the GMC have a duty of care to doctors under investigation?
In Suresh & Ors v GMC, the Court examined the GMC’s duty of care and Human Rights Act obligations for doctors under investigation.