Kings View Chambers successfully negotiate consensual panel determination
ings View Chambers have successfully negotiated a consensual panel determination for our client in a complex multi-handed case involving issues of poor clinical practise and failure to take action when safeguarding issues had been raised.
ings View Chambers have successfully negotiated a consensual panel determination for our client in a complex multi-handed case involving issues of poor clinical practise and failure to take action when safeguarding issues had been raised.
Our client was delighted with the outcome and stated:
“Catherine Stock represented me in an NMC Case with great excellence and expertise, showing great empathy, compassion and understanding. Everything ran with tranquillity and ended well”
Catherine Stock, joint head of chambers said in relation to this case: “It is so important to consider the possibility of coming to an agreement with the NMC where errors have been made but where there are circumstances that can be taken into account. This way, if our negotiations are successful your case is dealt with quicker and without unnecessary stress and cost.”
More News & Articles
Sexual misconduct, remediation and fitness to practise: lessons from Sadiq v GMC
Sexual misconduct is hard to remediate, but insight and structured remediation can still influence sanctions.
The GMC’s new guidance on raising patient safety concerns: implications for doctors’ fitness to practise
The GMC’s new consultation reinforces doctors’ duty to raise patient safety concerns, with fitness to practise risks for failures and a need for early expert legal advice.
Assessing insight when a registrant denies allegations in fitness to practise proceedings
How fitness to practise panels can assess genuine insight when a registrant denies allegations and offers no apology, balancing fairness with public protection.
