Client’s suspension revoked
Our client’s Suspension Order was revoked after the review tribunal found their fitness to practise no longer impaired.
Our client’s Suspension Order was revoked after the review tribunal found their fitness to practise no longer impaired.
Commenting on this case, fitness to practise defence barrister, Catherine Stock, said:
“This client had had a good outcome from an earlier fitness to practice hearing at the GDC. They were facing a number of allegations of dishonesty, some of which were admitted at the outset, and some denied. The case involved cross-examination of one main witness and all allegations that has been denied were found not proved.
“In cases of dishonesty before any healthcare regulator a sanction of erasure is nearly always an option for the Committee, however this client had worked with us for a considerable time in preparation and received a lesser sanction of suspension for 6 months.
Their review hearing took place recently and gain he had worked with us to be well-prepared for the hearing, and he was successfully restored with no conditions on his registration, and he is now free to practise unrestricted.
“This case highlights that for any fitness to practise hearing whether it be a substantive hearing, a review or restoration, being able to demonstrate insight and remediation is tantamount and something that is not easy to achieve without specialist advice.”
Speaking at the conclusion of their case, our client, M, said:
“Following on from my fitness to practise hearing, I once again sought counsel for a review hearing after a six-month suspension.
I thought about going it alone, but I am very glad I didn’t. I had to prepare for this hearing in the same way as the previous, and Catherine gave me the tools to do this.
“I was guided through the process and the GDC could not argue when they viewed the work I had done on remediation, reflection and insight in which Catherine had set for me.”
Restoration Courses
Courses suitable for any health and social care practitioner who is considering making an application for restoration back onto the register.
Insight & Remediation
Courses that are suitable for any healthcare practitioner who is facing an investigation or hearing at work or before their regulatory body.
Probity, Ethics & Professionalism
Courses designed for those facing a complaint or investigation at work or before their regulator, involving in part or in whole honesty, integrity and /or professionalism.
Disclaimer: This article is for guidance purposes only. Kings View Chambers accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken, in relation to this article. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances. Some content may have been generated by AI tools.
More News & Articles
When does delay in fitness to practise proceedings become unfair? High Court considers seven-year NMC case
Can lengthy fitness to practise delays amount to unfairness or an abuse of process? The High Court examines a seven-year NMC case and the legal implications for healthcare regulators and registrants.
What drives the most serious fitness to practise outcomes? GMC study points to four key factors
What factors are most likely to lead to serious fitness to practise sanctions for doctors? GMC research finds criminal convictions, the seriousness of concerns, allegation type and referral source are the strongest predictors of severe regulatory outcomes.
GMC v Sathyanath: what doctors need to know about clinical examinations, consent and fitness to practise
The High Court’s decision highlights the importance of clinical justification, informed consent and professional boundaries, with practical lessons for doctors and other regulated healthcare professionals.